wrote:
>Take it east Jeremy. Nobody said it was revolutionary. (I already know C++).
>And its precisely because its not new that you don't need a word for it.
>
then you woudl understand the idea of inheritance between objects and
classes. Now just extrapolate those concepts of classes and objects,
and inheretiance to social criticism and.....Does CPs inherited traits
from its parent classes lesson it's value as a class itself? I don't
think so, the problem is that there are some private functions in that
class that you are incapabale of addressing or grasping, and that is
what keeps your code from compiling clean. Sorry we can't prototype
those classes for you here, but there is only so much a language can
do, and at this point it's obvious that your using Borland C++, while
we're talking gcc here.
--
To John Dillinger, and hope he is still alive. |Nesta Stubbs|
[Next appendix] | [Return to index for Appendix A8] | [Return to index for Appendix A]