>
>
> > > But is "humanity" determined by biology or by how we describe ourselves.
> > > Its always seemed to me to be or of a cultural description than a
> > > physical one. Taking for granted that its a particular kind of biped's
> > > behavior in question.
>
> > Ever see a human outside a cultural context? Does our description of a
> > tree change the reality of the tree? I might be willing to stipulate
> > that our descriptions of ourselves may indeed change our culture but
> > those descriptions can never take place outside an already partially
> > defined cultural context.
>
> I'm not disputing that the physical plant of the homo sapiens has
> particular characteristics or that it isn't hardwired for certain
> activities or propensities but that the label "human" and its
> associations are temporary and, beyond that, proprietary to English if you
> want to be picky.
>
> I'm asserting only that there was a pre-"human" period of the species we
> now *call* human and that there will be, in all probability, a post-human
> phase pf our existence. I really didn't think this was that big a point.
> Sterling's covered all of this ground better in fiction than we possibly
> could in dry ol' usenet banter but I do enjoy talking about it.
>
> .mpa
You make my point. What I was trying to say was that how we define
"humanity" changes over time but that that definition is specific to a
particular cultural context. The genome changes over time but so does
the culture (more rapidly). A Cro-Magnan might not define Neanderthal
as pre-human in the same way we define both as pre-human. As such we
will never get to post-human because the definition of humanity is a
rolling one. It changes as we change. It is a mistake to plant a stake
in the (temporal) ground and say this is where humanity began as much
as it is a mistake to say that this is where humanity ends. It's the
same sort of mistake the pomos make when they decalre the end of
history.
**********************************************************************
Zeitgeyser - the Old Faithful of pop culture
"Unity is always at least two"
(Buckminster Fuller)
The trouble with anarchy is that it
ALWAYS degenerates into government (me, heehee)
**********************************************************************
[Next appendix] | [Return to index for Appendix A4] | [Return to index for Appendix A]